Print This Post
Email This Post
Newman on Christian Unity
The Baptism of Christ: ‘He did not renounce the religion of Abraham’Newman on the Conversion of St Paul: God’s ‘power made perfect in weakness’

In this extract from the beginning of An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine (1845), Newman explains his conviction that Christianity is an historical religion – that is, it has taken a definite historical form over the centuries. We shouldn’t assume, argues Newman, that Christianity is a different religion now – that is, substantially different – from what it was in the time of the Apostles:
Christianity has been long enough in the world to justify us in dealing with it as a fact in the world’s history. Its genius and character, its doctrines, precepts, and objects cannot be treated as matters of private opinion or deduction, unless we may reasonably so regard the Spartan institutions or the religion of Mahomet [Muhammad]. It may indeed legitimately be made the subject-matter of theories; what is its moral and political excellence, what its due location in the range of ideas or of facts which we possess, whether it be divine or human, whether original or eclectic [i.e. composed of elements drawn from various sources], or both at once, how far favourable to civilization or to literature, whether a religion for all ages or for a particular state of society, these are questions upon the fact, or professed solutions of the fact, and belong to the province of opinion; but to a fact do they relate, on an admitted fact do they turn, which must be ascertained as other facts … Christianity is no theory of the study or the cloister. It has long since passed beyond the letter of documents and the reasonings of individual minds, and has become public property. Its “sound has gone out into all lands,” and its “words unto the ends of the world.” [Ps 19:4] It has from the first had an objective existence, and has thrown itself upon the great concourse of men. Its home is in the world; and to know what it is, we must seek it in the world, and hear the world’s witness of it.
The hypothesis, indeed, has met with wide reception in these latter times, that Christianity does not fall within the province of history,—that it is to each man what each man thinks it to be, and nothing else; and thus in fact is a mere name for a cluster or family of rival religions all together, religions at variance one with another …. Or again, it has been maintained, or implied, that all existing denominations of Christianity are wrong, none representing it as taught by Christ and His Apostles; that the original religion has gradually decayed or become hopelessly corrupt; nay that it died out of the world at its birth, and was forthwith succeeded by a counterfeit or counterfeits which assumed its name, though they inherited at best but some fragments of its teaching [...].
All such views of Christianity imply that there is no sufficient body of historical proof to interfere with, or at least to prevail against, any number … of free and independent hypotheses concerning it. But this, surely, is not self-evident, and has itself to be proved. Till positive reasons grounded on facts are adduced to the contrary, the most natural hypotheses … is to consider that the society of Christians, which the Apostles left on earth, were of that religion to which the Apostles had converted them; that the external continuity of name, profession, and communion, argues a real continuity of doctrine; that, as Christianity began by manifesting itself as of a certain shape and bearing to all mankind, therefore it went on so to manifest itself … It is not a violent assumption, then … to take it for granted, before proof to the contrary, that the Christianity of the second, fourth, seventh, twelfth, sixteenth, and intermediate centuries is in its substance the very religion which Christ and His Apostles taught in the first, whatever may be the modifications for good or for evil which lapse of years, or the vicissitudes of human affairs, have impressed upon it.
Click here for the full text of An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine (leaves site)
(Picture: San Apollinare Nuovo, Ravenna (Italy), Mosaic of Christ the Redeemer, 6th century)
- News July 6th, 2010: Newman’s Beatification to take place at Rednal
- Calendar June 8th, 2010: Desktop Calendar: June
- News May 19th, 2010: Is Newman’s Miracle Credible? A Response to John Cornwell
- News May 11th, 2010: Press Release: John Cornwell’s analysis of Newman’s miracle is seriously flawed
- Calendar April 30th, 2010: Desktop Calendar: May
- Home Lost? Jump Straight Back to the Front Page.
- Read more about Newman's life Newman's story is one of the most fascinating and important of the nineteenth century. Read more about him here...
- What are 'Beatification' and 'Canonisation'? Want to know about Beatification? What is a 'Saint'? What does the Catholic Church believe about them?
- Newman and Beatification Why do people want Newman to be Beatified? What would he have thought of it?
- Donate to the Cause The Cause costs money and depends entirely on donations to move forward. Please donate generously.
- Want to keep informed? Subscribe! You can subscribe to this website - you'll be sent a daily 'Thought for the Day' from Newman's writings, as well as regular news and features.
- Calendar (15)
- Featured (86)
- News (63)
- Thought of the Day (591)
Papal Visit
Official site for the Papal Visit to the UK - September 16-19, 2010
Press Enquiries
Press Officer for the Beatification of Cardinal Newman
Prayer
Prayer for the Canonisation of the Venerable John Henry Newman
Newman Calendar
Brighten up your desktop, and remember the Cause at the same time!
Free Subscription
Get News, Thoughts and Features delivered as they happen. Never miss a thing!
What's This?
RSS
E-mail





